Actionable genomic landscapes from a real-world cohort of urothelial carcinoma patients.

BACKGROUND: Recent targeted therapies for advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer have generated enthusiasm, but the actionable genomic landscape of early-stage disease remains largely unknown. Here, we utilized a large, real-world cohort to comprehensively investigate the incidence of genetic alterations with potential therapeutic implications at all stages of bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed next-generation sequencing (NGS) data from 1,562 bladder cancer patients (stages I-IV) with formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor biopsies sequenced using the Tempus xT solid tumor assay. Incidence of genetic alterations, tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), and PD-L1 status were assessed and stratified by bladder cancer stage. For patients with tumor-normal match sequencing (n=966), incidental germline alterations in 50 genes were assessed. RESULTS: The cohort was composed of 165 stage I-II, 211 stage III, and 1,186 stage IV tumors. TMB-high, PD-L1 positive, and MSI-high status were noted in 14%, 33%, and 0.7% of tumors, respectively, and were similar across stages. Alterations in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)2/3, homologous recombination repair genes, additional DNA repair gene mutations (ERCC2, RB1, FANCC), and NTRK fusions were detected at similar frequencies across disease stages. We identified a low rate of incidental germline mutations in all tumors (5.2%) and in specific genes: MUTYH (1.9%), BRCA2 (0.5%), and ATM (0.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Important subsets of patients demonstrate genetic alterations in potentially actionable molecular pathways at all stages. This analysis found minimal variability in these alterations across stages, providing rationale for early identification of genetic alterations and personalization of therapies at all stages for patients with bladder cancer.

Longitudinal Monitoring of Circulating Tumor DNA to Predict Treatment Outcomes in Advanced Cancers.

PURPOSE: The response to cancer therapies is typically assessed with radiologic imaging 6-10 weeks after treatment initiation. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), however, has a short half-life, and dynamic changes in ctDNA quantity may allow for earlier assessment of the therapeutic response. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors referred to the Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center were invited to participate in a liquid biopsy protocol for which serial blood samples were collected before, during, and after systemic therapy. We isolated ctDNA from serially collected plasma samples at baseline, mid-treatment, and first restaging. Genomically informed droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) was performed, and ctDNA quantities were reported as aggregate variant allele frequencies for all detected molecular aberrations. RESULTS: We included 204 patients receiving 260 systemic therapies. The ctDNA detection rate was higher in progressors (patients with progressive disease) compared with nonprogressors (patients with stable disease, partial responses, or complete responses) at all time points (P < .009). Moreover, ctDNA detection was associated with a shorter median time-to-treatment failure (P ≤ .001). Positive delta and slope values for changes in ctDNA quantity were more frequent in progressors (P ≤ .03 and P < .001, respectively) and were associated with a shorter median time-to-treatment failure (P ≤ .014 and P < .001, respectively). Increasing ctDNA quantity was predictive of clinical and/or radiologic progressive disease in 73% of patients (median lead time, 23 days). CONCLUSION: Detection of ctDNA and early dynamic changes in its quantity can predict the clinical outcomes of systemic therapies in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Monitoring of Dynamic Changes and Clonal Evolution in Circulating Tumor DNA From Patients With IDH-Mutated Cholangiocarcinoma Treated With Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Inhibitors.

PURPOSE: IDH mutations occur in about 30% of patients with cholangiocarcinoma. Analysis of mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be performed by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). The analysis of ctDNA is a feasible approach to detect IDH mutations. METHODS: We isolated ctDNA from the blood of patients with IDH-mutated advanced cholangiocarcinoma collected at baseline, on therapy, and at progression to isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) inhibitors. RESULTS: Of 31 patients with IDH1R132 (n = 26) or IDH2R172 mutations (n = 5) in the tumor, IDH mutations were detected in 84% of ctDNA samples analyzed by ddPCR and in 83% of ctDNA samples analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). Patients with a low variant allele frequency of ctDNA detected by NGS at baseline had a longer median time to treatment failure compared to patients with high variant allele frequency of ctDNA (3.6 v 1.5 months; P = .008). Patients with a decrease in IDH-mutated ctDNA on therapy by ddPCR compared with no change/increase had a trend to a longer median survival (P = .07). Most frequent emergent alterations in ctDNA by NGS at progression were ARID1A (n = 3) and TP53 mutations (n = 3). CONCLUSION: Detection of IDH mutations in ctDNA in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma is feasible, and dynamic changes in ctDNA can correspond with the clinical course and clonal evolution.

A novel method for liquid-phase extraction of cell-free DNA for detection of circulating tumor DNA.

Low yields of extracted cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma limit continued development of liquid biopsy in cancer, especially in early-stage cancer diagnostics and cancer screening applications. We investigate a novel liquid-phase-based DNA isolation method that utilizes aqueous two-phase systems to purify and concentrate circulating cfDNA. The PHASIFY MAX and PHASIFY ENRICH kits were compared to a commonly employed solid-phase extraction method on their ability to extract cfDNA from a set of 91 frozen plasma samples from cancer patients. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was used as the downstream diagnostic to detect mutant copies. Compared to the QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid (QCNA) kit, the PHASIFY MAX method demonstrated 60% increase in DNA yield and 171% increase in mutant copy recovery, and the PHASIFY ENRICH kit demonstrated a 35% decrease in DNA yield with a 153% increase in mutant copy recovery. A follow-up study with PHASIFY ENRICH resulted in the positive conversion of 9 out of 47 plasma samples previously determined negative with QCNA extraction (all with known positive tissue genotyping). Our results indicate that this novel extraction technique offers higher cfDNA recovery resulting in better sensitivity for detection of cfDNA mutations compared to a commonly used solid-phase extraction method.

Dose-escalation study of vemurafenib with sorafenib or crizotinib in patients with BRAF-mutated advanced cancers.

BACKGROUND: BRAF inhibitors are effective in melanoma and other cancers with BRAF mutations; however, patients ultimately develop therapeutic resistance through the activation of alternative signaling pathways such as RAF/RAS or MET. The authors hypothesized that combining the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib with either the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib or the MET inhibitor crizotinib could overcome therapeutic resistance. METHODS: Patients with advanced cancers and BRAF mutations were enrolled in a dose-escalation study (3 + 3 design) to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of vemurafenib with sorafenib (VS) or vemurafenib with crizotinib (VC). RESULTS: In total, 38 patients (VS, n = 24; VC, n = 14) were enrolled, and melanoma was the most represented tumor type (VS, 38%; VC, 64%). In the VS arm, vemurafenib 720 mg twice daily and sorafenib 400 mg am/200 mg pm were identified as the MTDs, DLTs included grade 3 rash (n = 2) and grade 3 hypertension, and partial responses were reported in 5 patients (21%), including 2 with ovarian cancer who had received previous treatment with BRAF, MEK, or ERK inhibitors. In the VC arm, vemurafenib 720 mg twice daily and crizotinib 250 mg daily were identified as the MTDs, DLTs included grade 3 rash (n = 2), and partial responses were reported in 4 patients (29%; melanoma, n = 3; lung adenocarcinoma, n = 1) who had received previous treatment with BRAF, MEK, and/or ERK inhibitors. Optional longitudinal collection of plasma to assess dynamic changes in circulating tumor DNA demonstrated the elimination of BRAF-mutant DNA from plasma during therapy (P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Vemurafenib combined with sorafenib or crizotinib was well tolerated with encouraging activity, including among patients who previously received treatment with BRAF, MEK, or ERK inhibitors.

Safety and Efficacy of Vorinostat Plus Sirolimus or Everolimus in Patients with Relapsed Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma.

PURPOSE: Preclinical and early clinical data suggested that combining histone deacetylase (HDAC) and mTOR inhibitors can synergistically inhibit Hodgkin lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During the dose-escalation study (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01087554) with the HDAC inhibitor vorinostat and the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus (V+S), a patient with Hodgkin lymphoma refractory to nine prior therapies demonstrated a partial response (PR) lasting for 18.5 months, which promoted additional enrollment of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma as well as exploration of an alternative combination of vorinostat and mTOR inhibitor everolimus (V+E). RESULTS: A total of 40 patients with refractory Hodgkin lymphoma received V+S (n = 22) or V+E (n = 18). Patients received a median of five prior therapies, including brentuximab (n = 39), autologous stem cell transplantation (n = 26), and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (n = 12). The most frequent grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse event was thrombocytopenia in 55% and 67% of patients treated with V+S and V+E, respectively. Complete response was reported in 6 (27%) patients treated with V+S and 2 (11%) patients treated with V+E, and PR was reported in 6 patients (27%) treated with V+S and 4 (22%) patients treated with V+E (objective response rate of 55% and 33%, respectively). In summary, combined HDAC and mTOR inhibition had encouraging activity in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma and warrants further investigation. CONCLUSIONS: Combined HDAC and mTOR inhibition has salutary activity in patients with relapsed refractory Hodgkin lymphoma and warrants further investigation.

Targeting Oncogenic Super Enhancers in MYC-Dependent AML Using a Small Molecule Activator of NR4A Nuclear Receptors.

Epigenetic reprogramming in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) leads to the aberrant activation of super enhancer (SE) landscapes that drive the expression of key oncogenes, including the oncogenic MYC pathway. These SEs have been identified as promising therapeutic targets, and have given rise to a new class of drugs, including BET protein inhibitors, which center on targeting SE activity. NR4A nuclear receptors are tumor suppressors of AML that function in part through transcriptional repression of the MYC-driven oncogenic program via mechanisms that remain unclear. Here we show that NR4A1, and the NR4A inducing drug dihydroergotamine (DHE), regulate overlapping gene expression programs in AML and repress transcription of a subset of SE-associated leukemic oncogenes, including MYC. NR4As interact with an AML-selective SE cluster that governs MYC transcription and decommissions its activation status by dismissing essential SE-bound coactivators including BRD4, Mediator and p300, leading to loss of p300-dependent H3K27 acetylation and Pol 2-dependent eRNA transcription. DHE shows similar efficacy to the BET inhibitor JQ1 at repressing SE-dependent MYC expression and AML growth in mouse xenografts. Thus, DHE induction of NR4As provides an alternative strategy to BET inhibitors to target MYC dependencies via suppression of the AML-selective SE governing MYC expression.